<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick tip for getting sharper wildlife photos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photonaturalist.net/quick-tip-for-getting-sharper-wildlife-photos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photonaturalist.net/quick-tip-for-getting-sharper-wildlife-photos/</link>
	<description>tips and tutorials for digital nature photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 03:25:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kim Barley</title>
		<link>http://photonaturalist.net/quick-tip-for-getting-sharper-wildlife-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-7486</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim Barley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonaturalist.net/?p=2247#comment-7486</guid>
		<description>Where do I locate the &quot;sharpness&quot; option on my Canon 40D?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Where do I locate the &#8220;sharpness&#8221; option on my Canon 40D?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Berardi</title>
		<link>http://photonaturalist.net/quick-tip-for-getting-sharper-wildlife-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-6690</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Berardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 05:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonaturalist.net/?p=2247#comment-6690</guid>
		<description>@Joe - I would still sharpen during post production as well. The &quot;sharpness&quot; setting I mentioned in this post is an &lt;em&gt;additional&lt;/em&gt; way to sharpen the photo even more, and is specific to each camera. In fact, this &quot;sharpening&quot; is applied by default on most cameras, but the default level is pretty conservative in my observations.

@Hagen - Good point about sharpening being best for last. I&#039;ve noticed the sharpening technique used for these &quot;picture styles&quot; is incredibly good though on my Canon cameras, so I use a combination of this setting and some more sharpening as a last step in post processing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Joe &#8211; I would still sharpen during post production as well. The &#8220;sharpness&#8221; setting I mentioned in this post is an <em>additional</em> way to sharpen the photo even more, and is specific to each camera. In fact, this &#8220;sharpening&#8221; is applied by default on most cameras, but the default level is pretty conservative in my observations.</p>
<p>@Hagen &#8211; Good point about sharpening being best for last. I&#8217;ve noticed the sharpening technique used for these &#8220;picture styles&#8221; is incredibly good though on my Canon cameras, so I use a combination of this setting and some more sharpening as a last step in post processing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hagen</title>
		<link>http://photonaturalist.net/quick-tip-for-getting-sharper-wildlife-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-6686</link>
		<dc:creator>Hagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 03:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonaturalist.net/?p=2247#comment-6686</guid>
		<description>The major downside is that sharpening is best as the last step and is dependent on your output size, subject and medium.

I had originally shot jpg with sharpness at 7/7 and loved it. I would agree that if you are coming from a P&amp;S (as I did), you will be very surprised by the apparent softness in your jpg images. Start there and grow into RAW (and the extra HD space necessary :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The major downside is that sharpening is best as the last step and is dependent on your output size, subject and medium.</p>
<p>I had originally shot jpg with sharpness at 7/7 and loved it. I would agree that if you are coming from a P&amp;S (as I did), you will be very surprised by the apparent softness in your jpg images. Start there and grow into RAW (and the extra HD space necessary <img src='http://photonaturalist.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Williams</title>
		<link>http://photonaturalist.net/quick-tip-for-getting-sharper-wildlife-photos/comment-page-1/#comment-6678</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 21:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonaturalist.net/?p=2247#comment-6678</guid>
		<description>Great tip on the sharpness level, Steve.  After taking a shot, my natural inclination is to sharpen in post-production, and I don&#039;t do much of anything else.  Seems that if I adjust the sharpness at the camera, it would simplify my post-production work for most shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great tip on the sharpness level, Steve.  After taking a shot, my natural inclination is to sharpen in post-production, and I don&#8217;t do much of anything else.  Seems that if I adjust the sharpness at the camera, it would simplify my post-production work for most shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->