<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The secret to getting perfect light for your wildflower photographs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://photonaturalist.net/the-secret-to-getting-perfect-light-for-your-wildflower-photographs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://photonaturalist.net/the-secret-to-getting-perfect-light-for-your-wildflower-photographs/</link>
	<description>tips and tutorials for digital nature photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 18:36:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: juan</title>
		<link>http://photonaturalist.net/the-secret-to-getting-perfect-light-for-your-wildflower-photographs/comment-page-1/#comment-7170</link>
		<dc:creator>juan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 21:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonaturalist.net/?p=359#comment-7170</guid>
		<description>Hi. I once projected shade on a flower and the result was acceptable, not as an overcast day but acceptable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi. I once projected shade on a flower and the result was acceptable, not as an overcast day but acceptable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Berardi</title>
		<link>http://photonaturalist.net/the-secret-to-getting-perfect-light-for-your-wildflower-photographs/comment-page-1/#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Berardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonaturalist.net/?p=359#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Judy, no reason to apologize for any kind of question! Thanks for asking! the f-stop (or f-number) basically just tells you how wide your lens is opened up, and determines the photo&#039;s depth of field.

Smaller f-stops (like f/4) will have a VERY shallow depth of field, so much of the photo will be blurred out of focus.  They&#039;re good for shooting the flat parts of flowers, or if you just want the tip of a petal in focus.

Larger f-stops (like f/11 or f/22) will have a very deep depth of field, so more of the image will be in sharp focus.

When trying to isolate a wildflower in a photo, I&#039;ve never shot above f/8.. I usually use f/6.3 or f/8.

Another key to understanding depth of field though, is focal length and distance between the subject and background.  When your lens has a larger focal length (i.e. more than 100mm), you&#039;ll get a more blurred background.  Also, the greater the distance between the subject and the background, the blurrier or more out of focus the background will be.  That&#039;s why my favorite lens to shoot wildflowers with is the 70-200mm Canon f/4L

Let me know if any of this is unclear!

Steve</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Judy, no reason to apologize for any kind of question! Thanks for asking! the f-stop (or f-number) basically just tells you how wide your lens is opened up, and determines the photo&#8217;s depth of field.</p>
<p>Smaller f-stops (like f/4) will have a VERY shallow depth of field, so much of the photo will be blurred out of focus.  They&#8217;re good for shooting the flat parts of flowers, or if you just want the tip of a petal in focus.</p>
<p>Larger f-stops (like f/11 or f/22) will have a very deep depth of field, so more of the image will be in sharp focus.</p>
<p>When trying to isolate a wildflower in a photo, I&#8217;ve never shot above f/8.. I usually use f/6.3 or f/8.</p>
<p>Another key to understanding depth of field though, is focal length and distance between the subject and background.  When your lens has a larger focal length (i.e. more than 100mm), you&#8217;ll get a more blurred background.  Also, the greater the distance between the subject and the background, the blurrier or more out of focus the background will be.  That&#8217;s why my favorite lens to shoot wildflowers with is the 70-200mm Canon f/4L</p>
<p>Let me know if any of this is unclear!</p>
<p>Steve</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judy Lim</title>
		<link>http://photonaturalist.net/the-secret-to-getting-perfect-light-for-your-wildflower-photographs/comment-page-1/#comment-120</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy Lim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 05:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonaturalist.net/?p=359#comment-120</guid>
		<description>Steve,
please forgive my basic question, but i am a complete beginner. i love flowers, and like to take photos of them; i get the point you made about getting into a plane parallel with the flower&#039;s, but don&#039;t quite understand the meaning of F-stops and the use of aperture variation. my aim is to get the flower in focus (not easy when it is not a flat flower) but rendering the background blur so that it does not distract.
thanks for taking the time and trouble to explain to this beginner,
cheers, Judy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve,<br />
please forgive my basic question, but i am a complete beginner. i love flowers, and like to take photos of them; i get the point you made about getting into a plane parallel with the flower&#8217;s, but don&#8217;t quite understand the meaning of F-stops and the use of aperture variation. my aim is to get the flower in focus (not easy when it is not a flat flower) but rendering the background blur so that it does not distract.<br />
thanks for taking the time and trouble to explain to this beginner,<br />
cheers, Judy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mikes</title>
		<link>http://photonaturalist.net/the-secret-to-getting-perfect-light-for-your-wildflower-photographs/comment-page-1/#comment-82</link>
		<dc:creator>Mikes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 08:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonaturalist.net/?p=359#comment-82</guid>
		<description>as i read your posts, i can only say you&#039;re the best in what you do and that builds up your credibiliy. keep it up! Th suggestion about sunlight, like with a shower curatin an waiting for a cloudy day is a good one. i haven&#039;t thought about that befor. is this also true i i take pictures of peopl?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as i read your posts, i can only say you&#8217;re the best in what you do and that builds up your credibiliy. keep it up! Th suggestion about sunlight, like with a shower curatin an waiting for a cloudy day is a good one. i haven&#8217;t thought about that befor. is this also true i i take pictures of peopl?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Berardi</title>
		<link>http://photonaturalist.net/the-secret-to-getting-perfect-light-for-your-wildflower-photographs/comment-page-1/#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Berardi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Feb 2009 05:37:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonaturalist.net/?p=359#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Ching, just remember &quot;quality not quantity&quot; when it comes to natural light :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ching, just remember &#8220;quality not quantity&#8221; when it comes to natural light <img src='http://photonaturalist.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ching Ya</title>
		<link>http://photonaturalist.net/the-secret-to-getting-perfect-light-for-your-wildflower-photographs/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Ching Ya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 06:52:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://photonaturalist.net/?p=359#comment-10</guid>
		<description>This is a new trick for me. Lighting plays a huge part in photography, I&#039;ve always assume the more light the better; to prevent blurring and enhance contrast. Great to know at times a little less sun light could bring pleasant effects too. Thanks for the sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a new trick for me. Lighting plays a huge part in photography, I&#8217;ve always assume the more light the better; to prevent blurring and enhance contrast. Great to know at times a little less sun light could bring pleasant effects too. Thanks for the sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->